Timeline for How to convert chinese name into korean name?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
22 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 28, 2023 at 2:35 | answer | added | Noiril | timeline score: 0 | |
| Jul 17, 2023 at 4:04 | answer | added | user67275 | timeline score: 1 | |
| Mar 7, 2023 at 9:03 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
| Feb 5, 2023 at 8:49 | comment | added | Edboy | i believe your name converted would be 왕릉비 | |
| Feb 1, 2023 at 21:12 | comment | added | user13229973 | @dROOOze, please read my comment above. | |
| Feb 1, 2023 at 21:11 | comment | added | user13229973 | To both @jick and "dROOOze" (I can't tag you here for some reason): I realize in hindsight that I was beyond excessive and abrasive in tone and attitude. It's ironic because I'm critical of others yet in hindsight I was an infinite times worse. Native doesn't mean expert, I'm far from it. Although not an excuse, I also didn't interpret your question properly, dROOOze. Once again I'm sorry for my previous comments, and I'll take this opportunity to behave more appropriately here on this forum. | |
| Jan 31, 2023 at 17:14 | comment | added | dROOOze | @jick uhh, yes, the proposed “answer” and that author literally gives a Korean dictionary style eumhun entry for 飞, implying that the character is used in Korean, which is incredibly confusing and I believe wrong. | |
| Jan 31, 2023 at 3:54 | comment | added | jick | I approved @user13229973's proposed edit. I also think the original characters should stay. That's literally how the questioner writes their own name, and you can't tell someone they're writing their own name wrong in their own language. (And nobody suggested that 飞 is a valid character in Korean writing, so I don't think that point is relevant.) | |
| S Jan 31, 2023 at 3:52 | history | edited | jick | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
It is best in my opinion to use the original characters specified by the questioner as this is what his/her research was based on
|
| S Jan 31, 2023 at 3:52 | history | suggested | user13229973 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
It is best in my opinion to use the original characters specified by the questioner as this is what his/her research was based on
|
| Jan 30, 2023 at 0:25 | comment | added | user13229973 | @dROOOze Would you kindly re-read my comment? I said verbatim online 한자 dictionaries are perfectly capable of matching simplified with traditional characters. I have no idea what you're on about with the Communist Party of China, which once again I think is entirely irrelevant to anything related to the study of Korean and in particular to this question, and I think that's the end of this discussion. Thanks. | |
| Jan 30, 2023 at 0:08 | comment | added | dROOOze | @user13229973 Can you show me a Korean language dictionary or official resource with a list of Hanja (as used in the Korean language) which includes Simplified Chinese characters (as used in China)? I went on Naver's Hanja dictionary and very surprisingly, they include all Simplified Chinese characters (even ones exclusively invented by the Chinese Communist Party after 1956, such as 卫). Are you suggesting that these characters are used in Korean? | |
| Jan 29, 2023 at 23:47 | comment | added | user13229973 | @dROOOze I speak native Korean, I know 한문. 날 비 is one of the most basic 한자 characters as any native Korean speaker would know. Online 한자 dictionaries are perfectly capable of matching most simplified characters with traditional forms, thus rendering your previous edit materially insignificant and if anything a source for more confusion, which is why I assume the moderator stepped in to ensure that the questioner was okay with this. I certainly was confused and didn't feel the edit was relevant to adding clarification to an already pretty basic question. | |
| Jan 29, 2023 at 20:21 | comment | added | dROOOze | This is a request for help in a Korean forum, and 飞 is not a valid character in Korean. It’s generally inappropriate to use Simplified Chinese in a non-Chinese site and expect the users of the site to know what you’re talking about. | |
| Jan 29, 2023 at 14:17 | comment | added | user13229973 | @winter You can also edit your question back to its original form | |
| Jan 29, 2023 at 14:15 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Jan 31, 2023 at 3:52 | |||||
| Jan 29, 2023 at 14:14 | comment | added | user13229973 | @user17915 I think you're right and it's helpful that a moderator's stepped in to address this issue. I think the edit by "dROOOze" converted 날 비 from simplified to traditional (I may be wrong, I don't know Chinese) and I'm unsure whether this was necessary nor helpful | |
| Jan 29, 2023 at 7:34 | comment | added | user17915♦ | an edit was made on your question recently. In case there are any errors in the edit or it not something you intended to write, please roll back the edit or let me know here in the comment. | |
| S Jan 29, 2023 at 7:32 | history | suggested | dROOOze | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Fixed characters and added tags
|
| Jan 29, 2023 at 3:24 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Jan 29, 2023 at 7:32 | |||||
| S Jan 29, 2023 at 0:33 | review | First questions | |||
| Jan 29, 2023 at 7:32 | |||||
| S Jan 29, 2023 at 0:33 | history | asked | winter | CC BY-SA 4.0 |