When I listen to 오 on Naver Dict (or 오다 or 오늘), it sounds the same as . 오 sounds like a [u] sound, not an [o] sound like in Spanish como [komo]. (Click the speech icon with round, not vertical, sound waves for a human-recorded sound rather than text-to-speech.) Maybe 우 sounds a bit more emphatic, but it doesn't sound very different. In contrast, , 요³, and , and the text-to-speech 오 definitely sound like [o]. and Wikipedia's [o] also sounds like [u], although if I listen to it while thinking [o] in my head, it starts to sound more like [o]. But the vowels in 오, , and sound to me unambiguously like [u].

Is ㅗ more closed and thus sounds more like ㅜ in some certain phonological environments (after certain consonants, depending on vowel length, etc.), or is it more just that it varies by speaker or dialect? Would it be wrong to say ㅗ the way the text-to-speech says it? When ㅗ sounds like [u] to me, is ㅜ somehow even more closed, or are they really indistinguishable?

1 Answer 1


The slipperiness of vowels!

To my ear, there is a difference between and on Naver, and also between the voices that are there for too. They are very close though.

There are several factors at work here:

  • The same vowel phoneme /o/ can have a different phonetic range between different speech varieties (so IPA may not be as phonetic as one might expect). This is well known amongst hispanohablantes learning Italian, where distinguishing /o/ and /ɔ/ is an issue. Looking at the two formant charts for Spanish and Korean, we can see that Spanish /o/ lies around both Korean /o/ and /ɔ~ʌ/.
  • The length of vowels can change the "quality" of the vowel somewhat. In Standard South Korean, the long /oː/ is phonetically more closed than the short /o/. This is likely to be rather minor in actual speech, but dictionaries tend to preserve former standards.
  • There has been a vowel shift happening in modern South Korean, especially in the Greater Seoul area, with /o/ becoming [u] and /u/ fronting to [ʉ]. The contrast is weakening, however, with fronting of /u/ not being universal.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.