2

Why is it 만나서 반갑습니다 and not 만나 반갑습니다? The verb is clearly in 하십시오체, so shouldn't the 'Cause/Reason Connective Form' (as wiktionary calls it) 서 also be of the form 니?

0

2 Answers 2

2

It is not true that -(으)니 is associated exclusively with 하십시오체, nor is -(아/어)서 associated exclusively with 해체. In fact, these causal connective forms are used pretty much across all speech levels, although there is a distinct poetic / old vibe to -(으)니.

This blog post gives a good summary of the uses for -(으)니. You can see that it is more related to -(으)니까 in its causal meaning. The distinction between -(아/어)서 and -(으)니까 I'm sure you're familiar with, as it is a fundamental piece of Korean grammar.

One of the links above also states how only -(아/어)서 is used in "basic greetings". I perceive that because -(아/어)서 is for "naturally" arising cause-to-effect relationships, only that form is appropriate for 만나서 반갑습니다.

2

In addition to Michaelyus's nice answer, one more thing to consider is that 만나서 반갑습니다 is a fixed phrase.

Consider English "Good morning": you don't say "nice morning" even though good and nice are pretty much interchangeable, because it's a fixed phrase. Same for 만나서 반갑습니다.

  • Also, sentence-connecting(?) suffixes like -(으)니 aren't really associated with speech levels. You can have a perfectly natural expression with -으니 at any speech level, e.g.,

해가 지니 추워/춥네/춥다/추워요/춥습니다/etc. = It's cold now that the sun went down.

그렇게 하니 망가지지(요)! = You are doing it like that, that's why it breaks!

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge that you have read and understand our privacy policy and code of conduct.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.