1

I asked a question about 눈치 and have a good understanding of what it means.

센스 is another word that I understand as well but what would be a good way to differentiate between the 2?

눈치 없다 - has no awareness or doesnt pick up on social cues, environment

센스 없다 - has no sense, not in the English meaning, but doesn't have the capacity or understanding to figure out a good course of action in whatever circumstance

Things like using non-honorifics to elders have been used to describe something with no 눈치.

I was once told that I had no 센스 when it comes to taking pictures.

Would these be accurate definitions or is there a better way differentiate the 2? In my eyes, while they aren't 100% interchangeable, they do have similarities to where if you used one over the other, I would still know what someone meant.

Thoughts?

2

센스 is a more general term for the ability to "understand the situation" or "make a good choice", especially when it's hard to explain logically. I think 눈치 is more exclusive to "reading other people's feeling" (or "reading the atmosphere").

So, for example, if a person is good at real estate investment, we may say "저 사람 집을 고르는 센스가 있다." (He/she knows how to pick a good house.) You can't use 눈치 here: the person is not trying to read how you feel about it.

I think it can also mean "common sense". If someone lacks common sense and does something awkward/idiotic, you can say "넌 왜 그렇게 센스가 없냐?"

  • Colloquially, 개념 (originally "concept") is also used in a similar way, though I think it's stronger. To me, 센스가 없다 is something like wearing a pair of sandals with socks on a date. 개념이 없다 is something like running red light in front of a kindergarten. Finally, 눈치가 없다 is like staying late in a party of three when the other two are clearly trying to hit it off.
4
  • 1
    appreciate the explanation, that makes a lot of sense
    – mph85
    Jun 13 '19 at 4:07
  • 개념 is a stronger version of 센스 then? kinda like hate is a stronger version of dislike?
    – mph85
    Jun 13 '19 at 4:08
  • These things can be tricky (and change from speaker to speaker), but my take is: you can be a good person without 센스, but if you don't have 개념, you aren't a good person. Hope it makes sense (ha ha) for you.
    – jick
    Jun 13 '19 at 6:07
  • 센스 relates to one's behaviour that gives positive impressions to others; 개념, to norms and manners. They are not interchangeable.
    – Klmo
    Jun 14 '19 at 4:34
1

눈치 is a major factor to be a usual person

센스 is one factor to be a superior better than a usual person

1) When we meet for a photo, then we should wear a neat style. But if someone wear a gym suit (i.e. he did not make an effort), then he has no tact. Further, if some makes a grimace, then he has no tact. When someone has a dance dress or makes V-shape fingers, then he has a sense.

2) 그애 센스가 장난 아니다 His sense is not a simple act = He has a terrific sense (so that almost girl draw a romance with him)

@ 그애 센스가 장난 아니다. He is grotesque (for instance, he wear Halloween costume at Christmas)

3) 눈치밥 먹어서 눈치 많이 봐 He walks on eggshells, since he received a lot of scolds (=he ate a rice of scolds).

@ When he has no tact, then he would have a lot of difficulties during army duty period or at workplace. When he have no sense, then I suggest that he would be a officer man, but not entertainer.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.