I can understand why when ㄷ ㅌ ㅊ and ㅈ are in the 받침 since they require a stop to be pronounced, but I don't understand why when ㅅ or ㅆ are in the 받침, they are pronounced as a stop since they don't require one. Is there a reason behind this rule? Or maybe some historical reason? Thanks in advance.
-
If you know why that's the case for ㅈ, you should also know why for ㅅ– Incredibly HandSome SamuelJul 9 '17 at 16:24
-
ㅈ is an affricate. It requires a stop before the frication. ㅅ does not.– OkoyosJul 9 '17 at 16:28
-
Duplicate of korean.stackexchange.com/questions/75/… ?– user17915 ♦Jul 11 '17 at 2:26
-
@user17915 Like I said, I'm asking the why, not the when. I know how it works, but why?– OkoyosJul 11 '17 at 2:29
-
1Consonants in Korean have different phonetic value according to their position. In medieval Korean, a single consonant ㅅ was used as a genitive case marker. Now it is disappeared, and it was substituted by 받침. But even historians or linguists don't know the exact reason yet.– jungyh0218Jul 12 '17 at 8:42
Add a comment
|
Korean syllables may only end in single stops, either nasal or non-nasal stops, or in vowels. This is a defining feature of modern Korean phonotactics. Even if the hangeul shows two consonants, only one gets to be pronounced (think of nouns like 값 and 닭).
Both ㅅ and ㅆ are fricatives, so do not have plosive stops as components, unlike ㅊ and ㅈ. However, we must remember that a stop is not necessary a plosive. A plosive is a stop that has a release; in the case of ㅊ ㅈ the release is a fricative /s/ rather than a release burst like ㄷ ㅌ, so it is an affricate rather than a plosive.
However, if at the end of a syllable we do not release any of these consonants ㄷ ㅌ ㅊ ㅈ ㅅ ㅆ, we notice that they all have the same place of articulation (call it coronal, call it dental-alveolar, whatever), despite the fact that they would have very different releases. But because of the stopped, unreleased nature of Korean final non-nasal stops, the release does not matter; only the place of articulation of the consonant does.
-
1Dang, I don't know what you really said, but this answer is incredibly awesome nonetheless...and I thought this group was about dead too. Nice job! Maybe I should start hanging around more :))– B. AlvnJul 14 '17 at 11:27
-
@B.Alvn Plenty of people still hanging around - I think what we need to make the site come to life is more questions! :) Aug 14 '17 at 23:20
-